doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200003096
Article type: Original Research
1 January 1990
Volume 15 Issue 4
doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200003096
Article type: Original Research
1 January 1990
Volume 15 Issue 4
Reflections on Entitlement to a Child in Australian Women's Journals 1947–1987
Juliet Harper
Juliet Harper
CITATION: Harper J. (1990). Reflections on Entitlement to a Child in Australian Women's Journals 1947–1987. Children Australia, 15(4), 776. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200003096
Abstract
In the Macquarie Dictionary, a family is defined as “parents and their children, whether dwelling together or not”. To be a couple with no children puts one outside of this category when family is defined in that way. Indeed, it is only recently that the term “single parent family” has been coined and accepted as an alternative type of family structure. Prior to the seventies the reference was to the “single mother and her child” and earlier still, “unmarried mothers” and “illegitimate children” — “fillius nullis”, child of nobody, until the Children's Equality of Status Act in 1977.
Society still appears to hold the nuclear family as the ideal2 that is a male and a female, preferably married with one or more children. A couple remain a couple and are not considered a family until such time as they have a child. For those who wish to have a child but are unable to have one, this constitutes a painful situation, but one towards which society feels compassion and in the view of the author, supports the notion that couples are entitled to a child.