doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200003096

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 January 1990

Volume 15 Issue 4

Reflections on Entitlement to a Child in Australian Women's Journals 1947–1987

Juliet Harper

name here
Juliet Harper

CITATION: Harper J. (1990). Reflections on Entitlement to a Child in Australian Women's Journals 1947–1987. Children Australia, 15(4), 776. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200003096

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/776
go to url

Abstract

In the Macquarie Dictionary, a family is defined as “parents and their children, whether dwelling together or not”. To be a couple with no children puts one outside of this category when family is defined in that way. Indeed, it is only recently that the term “single parent family” has been coined and accepted as an alternative type of family structure. Prior to the seventies the reference was to the “single mother and her child” and earlier still, “unmarried mothers” and “illegitimate children” — “fillius nullis”, child of nobody, until the Children's Equality of Status Act in 1977.

Society still appears to hold the nuclear family as the ideal2 that is a male and a female, preferably married with one or more children. A couple remain a couple and are not considered a family until such time as they have a child. For those who wish to have a child but are unable to have one, this constitutes a painful situation, but one towards which society feels compassion and in the view of the author, supports the notion that couples are entitled to a child.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/776 for the Version of Record.