doi.org/10.1017/S0312897000007463

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 January 1985

Volume 9 Issue 4

Why Two Jurisdictions? Some Aspects of the Historical Context of the Decision to Maintain Separate Courts for Married and Unmarried Parents in Relation to Parental Rights in Victoria

Stephanie Charlesworth

name here
Stephanie Charlesworth1

Affiliations

1 University of Melbourne

Contributions

Stephanie Charlesworth -

CITATION: Charlesworth S. (1985). Why Two Jurisdictions? Some Aspects of the Historical Context of the Decision to Maintain Separate Courts for Married and Unmarried Parents in Relation to Parental Rights in Victoria. Children Australia, 9(4), 503. doi.org/10.1017/S0312897000007463

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/503
go to url

Abstract

Many professional people working with families are frustrated by the fact that there is still a marked differentiation made between children of married parents and children of non-married parents in the courts. This division has persisted in spite of legislation to remove the status of illegitimacy and the reasons for this are far from obvious to those who are not lawyers. This paper traces the historical background of this split in jurisdiction between State and Federal Courts (i.e., the Family Court) and concludes that it is based on an anachronistic view of State’s rights which no social group or political party would support today.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/503 for the Version of Record.