doi.org/10.1017/S0312897000007724

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 January 1982

Volume 7 Issue 2

Inter-Country Adoption Policy in Australia — The Abnegation of Responsibility?

Cliff Picton and Rosemary Calder

name here
Cliff Picton

name here
Rosemary Calder

CITATION: Picton C., & Calder R. (1982). Inter-Country Adoption Policy in Australia — The Abnegation of Responsibility? Children Australia, 7(2), 394. doi.org/10.1017/S0312897000007724

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/394
go to url

Abstract

Recent revelations in the media about the status of some Taiwanese children adopted by Australians raised again the issue of safeguards, official policies and practice in inter-country adoption. For many of the people significantly engaged in urging a raising of standards, the present situation and future possibilities foreshadowed in official quarters leave little room for optimism. In spite of well documented arguments for a uniform code of practice, responsibilities remain divided, offering loopholes for those who believe they have a special case that puts them outside the laid down procedures for assessment and approval. This paper argues that governments in Australia (State and Commonwealth) must not be allowed to walk away from responsibilities in inter-country adoptions, responsibilities which are firmly established and recognised as appropriate in domestic adoptions.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/394 for the Version of Record.