doi.org/10.1017/cha.2020.34

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 3 September 2020

Volume 45 Issue 4

Infant removal and the lack of representation for parents

Celine Harrison, Carol Bahemia and Debbie Henderson

name here
Celine Harrison1 * ORCID logo

name here
Carol Bahemia2

name here
Debbie Henderson3

Affiliations

1 University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

2 Carol Bahemia Lawyers, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

3 Family Inclusion Network [FinWA] of WA Inc., Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Correspondence

* Celine Harrison

Contributions

Celine Harrison -

Carol Bahemia -

Debbie Henderson -

Part of Special Series: Special Issue: Poverty and Child Abusego to url

CITATION: Harrison C., Bahemia C., & Henderson D. (2020). Infant removal and the lack of representation for parents. Children Australia, 45(4), 2236. doi.org/10.1017/cha.2020.34

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/2236
go to url

Abstract

This paper throws a spotlight on the systemic disadvantage experienced by parents who have their children removed from their care. With data drawn from the annual reports of the Legal Aid of Western Australia, the child protection agency in Western Australia, and the Productivity Commission, the authors illustrate the disconnection between the agency’s policy to reunify children once removed from their birth parents; the resources made available to support families to overcome their difficulties; and how the gap is further widened when parents without financial means and who are disempowered face legal proceedings on their own. We profile the increasing numbers of infants who are removed, the decreasing numbers of these infants who are discharged from care, and the shortfall of grants of legal aid that are provided to parents when they go to court. For this group of parents, permanent loss of their children is a reality. The aim of the paper is to capture the extent to which there is a fundamental blemish on the principles of due process and fairness, and once statutory processes are triggered, the best interests of the child and the support of parents are contingent, with poverty being the key mediating factor.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/2236 for the Version of Record.