doi.org/10.1017/cha.2019.14

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 21 June 2019

Volume 44 Issue 3

Five years after Carmody: practitioners’ views of changes, challenges and research in child protection

Ines Zuchowski

name here
Ines Zuchowski1 * ORCID logo

Affiliations

1 Social Work and Human Services, Douglas, Qld 4811, James Cook University, Australia

Correspondence

* Ines Zuchowski

Contributions

Ines Zuchowski -

CITATION: Zuchowski I. (2019). Five years after Carmody: practitioners’ views of changes, challenges and research in child protection. Children Australia, 44(3), 2172. doi.org/10.1017/cha.2019.14

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/2172
go to url

Abstract

Child protection work is a complex and difficult area of practice, one that is closely scrutinised and criticised, and impacts on the lives of many children. In Australia, child protection systems are overloaded, and increasing numbers of children and families receive child protection interventions each year. This study explored the views of North Queensland practitioners who work in the child protection field, examining changes and challenges in this field of practice, and their suggestions for the future research that is needed in child protection. The study took place 5 years after the 2013 Queensland Carmody inquiry into child protection intervention, which recommended sweeping changes to the child protection system. Twenty-two practitioners participated in this study. Respondents reported an increase in the complexity of cases, a gap in legislation change/practice frameworks and practice, and the application of trauma-informed practice. They highlighted the intersection of child protection, domestic violence and family law and observed that women and children continue to be exposed to violence because of Family Law Court orders. Respondents identified a number of areas where research is needed.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/2172 for the Version of Record.