doi.org/10.1017/cha.2015.6

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 June 2015

Volume 40 Issue 2

Should Governments be Above the Law? The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on First Nations Child Welfare

Cindy Blackstock

name here
Cindy Blackstock1 *

Affiliations

1 First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Edmonton, University of Alberta, Alberta

Correspondence

* Cindy Blackstock

Contributions

Cindy Blackstock -

Part of Special Series: Consilience in Action - Lessons From an International Childhood Trauma Conferencego to url

CITATION: Blackstock C. (2015). Should Governments be Above the Law? The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal on First Nations Child Welfare. Children Australia, 40(2), 1959. doi.org/10.1017/cha.2015.6

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1959
go to url

Abstract

Many child welfare statutes protect children when caregivers jeopardise their safety and best interests, but what if the risk is sourced in government child welfare policy or practice? Instead of including provisions to hold governments accountable for placing children in harm's way, governments and their agents are largely protected against any systemic maltreatment claims made against them. This paper describes a precedent-setting case before the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal attempting to hold the Canadian federal government accountable for its systemic failure to ensure that First Nations children are protected from maltreatment linked to inequitable federal child welfare funding on reserves. The case is a rare example using an independent judicial mechanism with the authority to make binding orders against the government and enveloping the proceedings in a public education and engagement movement. Implications of the case for child rights in Canada and abroad are discussed.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1959 for the Version of Record.