doi.org/10.1017/cha.2012.29

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 September 2012

Volume 37 Issue 3

Coping Strategies and Perceived Coping Effectiveness for Social Stressors among Children with HFASDs: A Brief Report

Gloria K. Lee, Marcus L. Thomeer, Christopher Lopata, Audrey L. Schiavo, Audrey M. Smerbeck, Martin A. Volker, Rachael A. Smith and Joshua E. Mirwis

name here
Gloria K. Lee1 *

name here
Marcus L. Thomeer2

name here
Christopher Lopata2

name here
Audrey L. Schiavo3

name here
Audrey M. Smerbeck4

name here
Martin A. Volker1

name here
Rachael A. Smith1

name here
Joshua E. Mirwis5

Affiliations

1 Department of Counseling, School & Educational Psychology, Buffalo, New York, University at Buffalo – the State University of New York, USA

2 Institute for Autism Research, Buffalo, New York, Canisius College, USA

3 Summit Educational Resources, Getzville, New York, USA

4 Department of Neurology, Buffalo, New York, University at Buffalo – the State University of New York, USA

5 Pioneer Middle School, Yorkshire, New York, USA

Correspondence

* Gloria K. Lee

Contributions

Gloria K. Lee -

Marcus L. Thomeer -

Christopher Lopata -

Audrey L. Schiavo -

Audrey M. Smerbeck -

Martin A. Volker -

Rachael A. Smith -

Joshua E. Mirwis -

CITATION: Lee G.K., Thomeer M.L., Lopata C., Schiavo A.L., Smerbeck A.M., Volker M.A., Smith R.A., & Mirwis J.E. (2012). Coping Strategies and Perceived Coping Effectiveness for Social Stressors among Children with HFASDs: A Brief Report. Children Australia, 37(3), 1840. doi.org/10.1017/cha.2012.29

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1840
go to url

Abstract

This brief report investigated coping strategies and their perceived effectiveness in response to a social stressor for 7–12 year olds with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders (HFASDs). Ninety-eight participants completed a self-report coping scale in response to a self-identified socially stressful situation. Responses yielded three categories of use and perceived effectiveness: (1) strategies used frequently and viewed as effective, (2) strategies not used frequently and not perceived as effective, and (3) strategies used frequently but not perceived as effective. Respondents reported high frequency use and high perceived effectiveness of six strategies that are generally considered as positive/engagement oriented coping. They also indicated low frequency use and low perceived effectiveness of five strategies broadly regarded as negative and avoidant/disengagement coping. The last cluster of four strategies, identified as frequently used but not effective, consisted of strategies less clearly categorised as positive/engaged vs. negative/disengaged. Implications for future research and clinical considerations are proposed.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1840 for the Version of Record.