doi.org/10.1375/jcas.36.1.12

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 April 2011

Volume 36 Issue 1

In ‘The Best Interests of the Child’: Critical Reflections on an Overused Construct

Patricia Hansen and Frank Ainsworth

name here
Patricia Hansen1

name here
Frank Ainsworth2 ORCID logo

Affiliations

1 patricia.hansen@acu.edu.au

2

Contributions

Patricia Hansen -

Frank Ainsworth -

CITATION: Hansen P., & Ainsworth F. (2011). In ‘The Best Interests of the Child’: Critical Reflections on an Overused Construct. Children Australia, 36(1), 1778. doi.org/10.1375/jcas.36.1.12

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1778
go to url

Abstract

The construct ‘the best interest of the child’ is embedded in child protection legislation in all Australian states and territories. This phrase or construct in its modern iteration that dates from 1973 is constantly evoked when decisions are being made about a child's future following the substantiation of a case of child abuse and neglect. The use of the best interests of the child as a standard for decision-making, even though there is no consensus in law or social science as to what the construct means, needs to be questioned. What often follows from reliance on the best interests of the child is the placement of a child in foster care or kinship care in the hope that this will produce a better outcome for the child than if they remained in parental care. No doubt this is true for some children. Recent outcomes studies of foster care point to less than promising results for many children. As a result it can be argued that placing a child in foster care is a gamble with the child's future life.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1778 for the Version of Record.