doi.org/10.1017/S103507720001107X
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2006
Volume 31 Issue 2
doi.org/10.1017/S103507720001107X
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2006
Volume 31 Issue 2
Recent Australian child protection and out-of-home care research: What’s been done – and what needs to be done?
Affiliations
1 Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, NSW, judyc@law.usyd.edu.au
2 National Child Protection Clearinghouse, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, daryl.higgins@aifs.gov.au, leah.bromfield@aifs.gov.au
3 Australian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia, Magill, SA, Dorothy.A.Scott@unisa.edu.au
Contributions
Judy Cashmore -
Daryl J. Higgins -
Leah M. Bromfield -
Dorothy A. Scott -
Judy Cashmore1
Daryl J. Higgins2
Leah M. Bromfield2
Dorothy A. Scott3
Affiliations
1 Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, NSW, judyc@law.usyd.edu.au
2 National Child Protection Clearinghouse, Australian Institute of Family Studies, Melbourne, daryl.higgins@aifs.gov.au, leah.bromfield@aifs.gov.au
3 Australian Centre for Child Protection, University of South Australia, Magill, SA, Dorothy.A.Scott@unisa.edu.au
CITATION: Cashmore J., Higgins D.J., Bromfield L.M., & Scott D.A. (2006). Recent Australian child protection and out-of-home care research: What’s been done – and what needs to be done? Children Australia, 31(2), 1570. doi.org/10.1017/S103507720001107X
Abstract
A research-led reform strategy is urgently required in the field of child protection in Australia. While international research can be a valuable resource, a strong research base which is relevant to this country’s needs, legislation and service systems is essential. Two recent audits of Australian research completed over the past decade – one on out-of-home care and the other on child protection more broadly – have highlighted significant gaps in existing research. There is a number of important topics that have not been addressed – as well as an over-reliance on small-scale, qualitative studies and a very low level of funding for research. This paper explores these gaps and identifies crucial areas for development, encompassing: the development of a national child protection and out-of-home care research agenda; adequate funding for research, especially for multi-site, cross-jurisdictional studies; and closer collaboration between researchers, policymakers and practitioners to close the gap between what we know and what we do.