doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010877
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2005
Volume 30 Issue 4
doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010877
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2005
Volume 30 Issue 4
Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Theory and practice examined through the lens of power
Dianne Rogers1
Affiliations
1 Centre for Women’s Studies School of Social Work and Community Welfare James Cook University Townsville, Qld, Dianne.Rogers@jcu.edu.au
Contributions
Dianne Rogers -
Dianne Rogers1
Affiliations
1 Centre for Women’s Studies School of Social Work and Community Welfare James Cook University Townsville, Qld, Dianne.Rogers@jcu.edu.au
CITATION: Rogers D. (2005). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Theory and practice examined through the lens of power. Children Australia, 30(4), 1551. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010877
Abstract
Currently, discourses on Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) within Australia are in conflict. There are two dominant and conflicting knowledge bases: the biological and genetic approach, and the psychological approach, which includes behavioural and psychoanalytic theories on the cause of deviant or difficult behaviour. Other minor discourses also exist, including the diet perspective and an emerging strengths based discourse arising from support groups. The debate is not purely academic as theory, and the practice developed from that theory, have a huge impact on families. An overview of the competing discourses currently operating in Australia, particularly in Queensland, is presented. The author argues that the theories and the associated strategies recommended by professionals, result in varying outcomes for families and individuals affected by the disorder.