doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010853
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2005
Volume 30 Issue 4
doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010853
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2005
Volume 30 Issue 4
Children as decision makers
David Vicary1
Judy Tennant2
Jade Santa Maria2
Sarah Wadley2
Affiliations
1 Office for Children and Youth, Curtin University of Technology, Centre for Vulnerable Children and Families, University of Western Australia
2 Office for Children and Youth West Perth, WA, 6005, Judy.Tennant@dcd.wa.gov.au
Contributions
David Vicary -
Judy Tennant -
Jade Santa Maria -
Sarah Wadley -
David Vicary1
Judy Tennant2
Jade Santa Maria2
Sarah Wadley2
Affiliations
1 Office for Children and Youth, Curtin University of Technology, Centre for Vulnerable Children and Families, University of Western Australia
2 Office for Children and Youth West Perth, WA, 6005, Judy.Tennant@dcd.wa.gov.au
CITATION: Vicary D., Tennant J., Maria J.S., & Wadley S. (2005). Children as decision makers. Children Australia, 30(4), 1549. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200010853
Abstract
Involving children and young people in planning, decision making and the evaluation of services and programs inevitably raises the eyebrows of adults working in the areas of service delivery, program development and policy formulation. Some adults may question young people’s ability to see the ‘big picture’ and to make decisions, and even their right to be engaged in the first place. In challenging these ideas, the Western Australian Office for Children and Youth established a Children’s Advisory Group (CAG) in 2004 – the first of its kind to be created within the Western Australia Government, and one of the first such groups to be set up in Australia.
The current Children’s Advisory Group (CAG) is a diverse group often primary school children aged 9-12 years from the Perth metropolitan area. They are actively involved in all aspects of the Office’s operation. The CAG has been evaluated throughout its inaugural year of operation, both in terms of process and impact, and has been found to have a significant impact upon government policy and practice. This paper will outline the process for the establishment and implementation of a CAG and the evaluation of a CAG on government policy. It will highlight evaluation findings and discuss future directions.