doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200006076
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2004
Volume 29 Issue 3
doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200006076
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2004
Volume 29 Issue 3
Barriers to permanency planning: What the literature suggests
Kerry Brydon1
Affiliations
1 Department of Social Work, Monash University, PO Box 197, Caulfield East, Vic 3145, kerry.brydon@med.monash.edu.au
Contributions
Kerry Brydon -
Kerry Brydon1
Affiliations
1 Department of Social Work, Monash University, PO Box 197, Caulfield East, Vic 3145, kerry.brydon@med.monash.edu.au
CITATION: Brydon K. (2004). Barriers to permanency planning: What the literature suggests. Children Australia, 29(3), 1497. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200006076
Abstract
Early studies concerned with permanency planning identified that many children remained in care for prolonged periods of time, in the absence of clearly defined plans for their long-term future. The studies also highlighted concern that multiple placements have a deleterious impact on children. As a consequence, permanency planning frameworks were developed to address the problems of welfare drift, the essence of permanency planning being timely decision-making and concurrent planning. However, there appear to be some systemic issues impacting on the application of the permanency planning framework. There also remains a policy preference for family preservation, which adversely affects permanency planning. The need is to conceptualise permanency planning as existing along a continuum of planning options for children, co-existing with family preservation models.