doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200006076

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 January 2004

Volume 29 Issue 3

Barriers to permanency planning: What the literature suggests

Kerry Brydon

name here
Kerry Brydon1

Affiliations

1 Department of Social Work, Monash University, PO Box 197, Caulfield East, Vic 3145, kerry.brydon@med.monash.edu.au

Contributions

Kerry Brydon -

CITATION: Brydon K. (2004). Barriers to permanency planning: What the literature suggests. Children Australia, 29(3), 1497. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200006076

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1497
go to url

Abstract

Early studies concerned with permanency planning identified that many children remained in care for prolonged periods of time, in the absence of clearly defined plans for their long-term future. The studies also highlighted concern that multiple placements have a deleterious impact on children. As a consequence, permanency planning frameworks were developed to address the problems of welfare drift, the essence of permanency planning being timely decision-making and concurrent planning. However, there appear to be some systemic issues impacting on the application of the permanency planning framework. There also remains a policy preference for family preservation, which adversely affects permanency planning. The need is to conceptualise permanency planning as existing along a continuum of planning options for children, co-existing with family preservation models.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/1497 for the Version of Record.