doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200009548
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2000
Volume 25 Issue 1
doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200009548
Article type: Original Research
1 January 2000
Volume 25 Issue 1
Resignation, radicalism or realism?: What role for non-government agencies in the changing context of child and family welfare?
Jon O’Brien
Jon O’Brien
CITATION: O’Brien J. (2000). Resignation, radicalism or realism?: What role for non-government agencies in the changing context of child and family welfare? Children Australia, 25(1), 1270. doi.org/10.1017/S1035077200009548
Abstract
Non-government welfare agencies have a history of both service provision and advocating for social justice and welfare reform. Current economic and social changes have had an impact on our understanding of the role of welfare and the state. There has been a significant reconfiguration of community services, with important implications for the present and future role of welfare agencies.
This article seeks to identify questions confronting agencies that seek to maintain a commitment to social action by examining an 18-month child abuse prevention campaign conducted by a coalition of agencies in NSW. Significant insights and challenges that emerged from the campaign are identified. Questions about the role of non-government agencies are revisited and the value of welfare agencies’ contribution to social equity reasserted.