doi.org/10.1017/S0312897000013497

Article type: Original Research

PUBLISHED 1 June 1977

Volume 2 Issue 2

Perspectives on Assessment in Adoption

Rosemary Calder and Helen Keil

name here
Rosemary Calder

name here
Helen Keil

CITATION: Calder R., & Keil H. (1977). Perspectives on Assessment in Adoption. Children Australia, 2(2), 110. doi.org/10.1017/S0312897000013497

download full pdf
https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/110
go to url

Abstract

The assessment process in the field of adoption has received scant attention in the literature. This may be a comment on the lack of confidence felt by professionals working in this field, but it all reflects a lack of accountability both to their colleagues and their clients, the prospective adoptive parents and the children being placed for adoption. One of the few studies in this field “Adoptive Screening, new data, new dilemmas” (Brown and Brieland)1 points to the need for a much closer examination of the assessment process, highlighting in particular the way in which social workers may be influenced by their own values as well as by agency criteria. The study goes on to point out that in general “agency practices in this sample reflect substantial caution about placements”. The Child Welfare League of America Standards for Adoption Service: Revised, states that “It is every child's right to have protection. The kind of care that meets his needs and which he would ordinarily be expected to receive from his parents. The family, the community agencies, and the states have responsibilities related to the assurance of this right”. If we take this statement as reflecting the values and assumptions underlying practice in adoption service, obviously the assessment process has a key role to play in protecting the right of children.

This PDF has been produced for your convenience. Always refer to the live site https://childrenaustralia.org.au/journal/article/110 for the Version of Record.